Osiris[]
Support[]
- it's a pretty depthful article in description of the planet. i feel this is fit to be featured because it's a pretty successful community project with input and participation from many, many users in our community. if you feel its a bit short, can you elaborate on what else should be written? –seacastles
- Eve (talk)
- per marinara I just need a little bit of love...
- very well written article and it's a pretty noteworthy page too which gives it an extra reason to support 11:04, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
- Sr.Wario (talk) 18:16, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
- I support it because these projects bring all the community together. TenshiHey yo!
- It's good PolisKanin
- Lumoshi (t • c)
KinglerMaster - I was about to pick neutral, but I thought about how it brought the community together and how well-made it was, so I decided to support. Because ?
- dehydration's grasp - The page is detailed, has good art, etc. No real reason not to support.
- It's been real fun working on this project. It definitely deserves recognision through a Featured. IcicleIllusionist 21:20, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
Neutral[]
It's a nice article, but I'll go neutral. Ismael Perez Ψ (talk • contribs • blog) 21:00, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
Oppose[]
- Personally I do not like this article; it is not entirely that well written and has no detail or length to it. I do not believe in attaching it to the project either, and even if I did I wouldn't give it points for that; that project is not that successful, usually only being shoehorned into things that didn't need it to exist. Two examples are Osirisvision and the Alternate Fantendoverse, which would have taken place on the planet had it not died. Generally any projects based entirely on it fail, like the two wargames, and many people have barely worked on their country, not that it matters because most small countries are unimportant. I do not like the project or the page, whichever one I am supposed to grade it on.
- per ~ Crim